Login
You're viewing the f.duriansoftware.com public feed.
  • Oct 16, 2026, 8:00 PM

    got my first “why so angry” from some oblivious motherfucker

    tell me, gang. read torvalds’ words and tell me why I’m so angry

    💬 6🔄 1⭐ 0

Replies

  • Oct 16, 2026, 8:02 PM

    why would I respond to repeated and personal betrayals by one of the most toxic men in tech with anger?

    and yes, when our labor is stolen that’s a personal betrayal. it doesn’t matter if torvalds knows who I am. I frankly don’t give a shit if he does. what I need you to know is he’s a weak fuck pretending to be a genius.

    💬 3🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 3🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Oct 16, 2026, 8:16 PM

    @zzt@mas.to

    "when our labor is stolen that’s a personal betrayal"
    I don't understand how more people don't see this. They're strip-mining the internet and selling it back to you via taps that they control. It's crazy to me that people are so quick to willingly surrender to what is clearly a new form of mass oppression that's taking root.

    I'm already dealing with fresh college grads who can't arrive at solutions without prompting, it's extremely alarming every time I run into these people in classes.

    Also, as an aside, the people who are okay with slopping code but don't like it when art is slopped are a whole other enigma to me. Like, do you just not value your work? Is that it?

    💬 5🔄 5⭐ 0
  • Oct 16, 2026, 9:15 PM

    @axel @zzt yup, I ask myself the same question everyday. I’m sure they used to value their work, I’m sure ….

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 1
  • Oct 16, 2026, 9:48 PM

    @axel @zzt

    Altman did say:

    "We see a future where intelligence is a utility like electricity or water and people buy it from us on a meter and use it for whatever they want to use it for," he added"

    Source: archive.ph/Rh1tM

    It's why they've had books destroyed after scanning them for AI, with the intention of forcing us to depend on AI's regurgitated output when they originals can no longer be found.

    This is by design and goes beyond just AI vomit infecting open source. 🤬

    💬 3🔄 5⭐ 2
  • Oct 16, 2026, 11:37 PM

    @synnfynn @axel @zzt
    The goal is to destroy our ability to easily find facts so they can have the models tell us whatever is convenient for the fascist capital class.

    💬 0🔄 2⭐ 1
  • Oct 17, 2026, 10:09 AM

    @synnfynn @axel @zzt OK now that's getting a bit too paranoid. They aren't destroying the books to prevent us getting them. Most of them are too rare to have many copies out there. They're just grabbing anything

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 17, 2026, 10:16 AM

    @ariaflame @synnfynn @axel they’re doing more than just destroying rare books in their repeated attempts to be the only source remaining for the data they’ve consumed for training

    2026 is perhaps a poor year to accuse someone else of being a bit too paranoid

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 17, 2026, 10:20 AM

    @zzt @synnfynn @axel Oh, you have evidence that they are destroying multiple copies of the same rare, and thus probably old and not terribly relevant to modern day books? Please, do provide.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 17, 2026, 10:22 AM

    @ariaflame @synnfynn @axel yes we do! it’s extremely easy to find actually

    but I notice you avoided the point of my post, and are now sounding like a fucking asshole who wants an internet debate on a Saturday

    feel free to go find the news article yourself, you weird fucking dickhead

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Oct 17, 2026, 10:23 AM

    @axel @zzt
    >> Like, do you just not value your work? Is that it?

    I work with many people in the corporate structure and "not putting a value in their work" is exactly one of the reasons why they are fine with all this AI-bullshit.
    They are just exchanging their time for money. Nothing more. No value creation happening.

    And for some people the only time they started to create "value" is when they used LLM to make a lot of work that looks "professional". And this hooks them very bad.

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Oct 16, 2026, 8:36 PM

    @zzt
    Being angry is a warranted response.

    (I'm not more angry as I burnt it up on the FreeCAD slop-acceptance/wake thread being asked do I know FreeCADs processes enough to be allowed to have my voice heard.)

    💬 2🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 3🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 16, 2026, 8:39 PM

    @zzt
    Being interrogated on the above by the head WIP post writer I can think about a reason or two.

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Oct 16, 2026, 8:51 PM

    @zzt
    DO NOT MAKE ANY MISTAKES. DO NOT SUGGEST WE ADD A MODEL TIMELINE ALA LITERALLY EVERY PROFESSIONAL CAD SUITE
    @dzwiedziu

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 2
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • bitofdespairdolls.in.sudoparadise.fi@bsky.brid.gy
    Oct 16, 2026, 8:59 PM

    Imagine clutching your pearls about directing harsh words at Linus fucking Torvalds. The perkeleen vittupää famous for being so sensitive about flinging insults over technical disagreements.

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0