Login
You're viewing the post.lurk.org public feed.
  • Jun 26, 2026, 11:09 AM

    @EI3JDB As we say in Danish, "mange bække små gør stor å" (many small streams make a great river).

    I have an American relative who tells me that one of the reasons many of them drive ridiculous giant cars over there is ... road safety. This is because the giant cars are normalized, and driving a compact car puts you at risk of getting hit and killed by someone driving a Suburb-Panzer. The statistics bear this out: The increased popularity of large SUVs has *increased* traffic fatalities for pretty much everyone who's not driving a SUV. This means that in that context, buying a big SUV sure looks like a reasonable way to keep your family safe.

    But I'd say that the most productive place to cast blame here isn't a random American family who somehow has to keep existing in the middle of an insane vehicular arms race, but rather the politicians and automaker executives who allowed that arms race to kick off in the first place (and, in the latter case, directly profit from it).

    Likewise, it's a *choice* that basically the entire so-called western world changed our approach to living arrangements in a way that makes it difficult to function without a car. It's not something inherent to the human condition, it's a politico-economic decision that can be (and in some places, to various extents, *has been*) reversed.

    💬 1🔄 3⭐ 23

Replies

  • Jun 26, 2026, 11:13 AM

    @datarama And one of the things we can do is vote for politicians that will make those changes.

    At least those of us who live in countries with sane-ish politics can. Not sure what to suggest in two-party FPtP countries. :-(

    💬 1🔄 1⭐ 11
  • Jun 26, 2026, 12:09 PM

    @EI3JDB @datarama I'm not condoning violence here, but in a country where you can buy guns over the counter, any concerned citizen can take their gun, point it at the evil trying to profit from killing millions, and pull the trigger. As was aptly demonstrated in recent history btw.

    Pretending a broken system of governance somehow prevents citizens from seeking justice is historically incorrect and ridiculous.

    If you would come up with a creative nonviolent way to do something, I would respect that. This "can't change the system because of the system" attitude is the problem imo.

    💬 1🔄 2⭐ 9
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • bloomtime!thesquirrelfish@sfba.social
    Jun 26, 2026, 3:49 PM

    @datarama @EI3JDB
    Absolving the random American family is a claim that American democracy & capitalism have completely failed - I have some sympathy in that argument. However I don't believe it's entirely true.
    Today more people complain about the price of gas or the lack of parking than notice the deaths & hospitalizations cars cause even in their own communities let alone climate change.
    The refusal to look at the problems because they object to the potential solutions is so strong among the 'random Americans' that it has become culpability IMHO.

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 5