Login
You're viewing the mstdn.social public feed.
  • Aug 2, 2025, 2:36 AM

    The current administration in the US has, through various funding agencies such as the NSF and NIH, has recently suspended virtually all federal grants to my home university, UCLA (including my own personal grant, although that is far from the most serious impact of this decision), on the grounds that UCLA was “failing to promote a research environment free of antisemitism and bias”. One can certainly debate whether these grounds were justified, or whether they merit the extremely draconian damage to the very research environment that this decision is claiming to protect, but if nothing else this unprecedented decision does not appear to have followed the usual standards of due process for actions of this nature; for instance, there appears to have been no good faith effort by the administration to receive a response from UCLA to its allegations before implementing its decision.

    The suspension of my personal grant has a non-trivial impact on myself (in particular, my summer salary, which I had already deferred in order to allow the previously released NSF funds to support several of my graduate students over this period, is now in limbo), and now gives me almost no resources to support my graduate students going forward; but this is only a fraction of a percent of the entire amount being suspended. A far greater concern is the impact on the Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics (IPAM) ipam.ucla.edu/, which despite receiving preliminary approval earlier this year for a new five-year round of funding (albeit at significantly reduced levels) from the NSF, now only has enough emergency funding for a few months of further operation at best if the suspension is not lifted. (1/4)

    💬 14🔄 355⭐ 295

Replies

  • Aug 2, 2025, 2:37 AM

    IPAM (pictured here in a photo I took today), as one of the six NSF-funded math institutes, has been a great success since its founding in 2000. Its specialty is creating three-month programs where participants (both junior and senior) from two or more fields of mathematics, science, or industry interact through workshops, participant-driven seminars, and informal interactions, centered around a theme that had been identified as particularly fertile for bringing together two or more otherwise disparate communities.

    One well-known example that I was involved many years ago was the 2004 program ipam.ucla.edu/programs/long-pr on Multiscale geometry and analysis in high dimensions, where the organizers had identified the potential for bringing together pure mathematicians whose work involved geometry at multiple scales with scientists interested in such applied topics as signal processing or the accurate modeling of materials. I participated extensively in this program, and in particular interacted quite a bit with one of the organizers (Emmanuel Candes) as well as Justin Romberg, leading to several foundational papers in the field now known as "compressed sensing", which permits (in certain circumstances) the rapid acquisition of high-resolution images or other information from a relatively small number of measurements. (Perhaps the most well known applications of the compressed sensing algorithms that came out of the work of Emmanuel, myself, Justin, David Donoho, and others was the ability to speed up the time required for a medical-grade MRI scan by up to an order of magnitude.) (2/4)

    The Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics (IPAM)
    💬 1🔄 22⭐ 1
  • Aug 2, 2025, 2:37 AM

    Some accounts claim that Emmanuel and I actually started collaborating at the preschool that both of our children attended at the time, but the truth is that our main collaboration actually started at IPAM; the fact that we met on a near-daily basis at the preschool was very useful to continue the collaboration, but it was not exactly an ideal environment to initiate it.

    I have been involved in several other very interesting IPAM programs since then; for instance, in 2023 I was the lead organizer in an IPAM-hosted workshop on Machine Assisted Proof ipam.ucla.edu/programs/worksho, which turned out to be a very well-timed event (occurring a few months after the launch of ChatGPT, for instance), bringing together pure mathematicians, computer scientists, and several people from industry and opening important channels of communication between researchers in such topics as proof formalization, machine learning, large language models, computer algebra solvers, and satisfiability solvers. (I previously posted on my experiences at that workshop at mathstodon.xyz/@tao/1098581842 .) My experiences at that workshop, as well as the connections made, permitted me to get up to speed on the latest developments in all of these areas, which now encompass a large portion of my current research interests. (3/4)

    💬 2🔄 10⭐ 0
  • Aug 2, 2025, 2:37 AM

    But perhaps the biggest positive contributions of institutes such as IPAM is not on senior faculty such as myself (who often have other resources and connections to draw upon), but on early career researchers, especially those from less well known institutions who might not otherwise have many opportunities to interact with the researchers at the emerging interface between two or more fields that were just beginning to become interconnected. When I was a postdoc, I experienced that opportunity myself in 1997 at a different NSF-funded institute (MSRI, now known as SLMath) in a program slmath.org/programs/60 on harmonic analysis, which was instrumental in setting up several extremely productive collaborations in my early career. Many of my colleagues and collaborators can also testify to positive early-career experiences in such institute programs as similarly unlocking their own research potential. Losing one of these institutes would have major negative impacts on the next generation of mathematical scientists.

    (Disclosure: I am scheduled this year to become Director of Special Projects at IPAM, taking over from Stanley Osher.) (4/4)

    💬 3🔄 19⭐ 2
  • 💬 1🔄 5⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Aug 2, 2025, 4:43 PM

    @tao
    This is terrible, and deeply damaging to our fields at a time when mathematical research is more impactful than ever. I believe a wide majority of the American populace disapprove of these measures.

    All we need is for the legislature to see that this research is vital to our nation's scientific lead and standing. Perhaps if it were framed as a national security issue, it would be taken more seriously? Congress is reversing the NASA budget cuts. The NSF cuts can be reversed, too.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 3, 2025, 3:27 PM

    @tao it is sad that funding has been pulled.
    But many, many faculty and academics stood silent while a "Jew exclusion zone" was erected at UCLA. For months the university dithered while Jewish students were harassed and intimidated

    The harassment was not unlike what early times in Nazi Germany looked like.

    Many academics believe they can just put their heads down and "do science". But why not speak up? Because of fear?

    Palestine viewpoints should not be suppressed, but neither should Jewish students. Moral courage would have compelled academics to take a stand that said, we support free speech, but we do not condone harassment.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 4, 2025, 1:26 PM

    @burnoutqueen @Epluspi @tao and why is that? all he said is that while views on Palestine should not be suppressed through manipulation of federal funds - colleges and faculty WERE turning a blind eye to very obvious antisemitic demonstrations on campus and sometimes supported them, its not being a “fascist lier” its called stating a fact.

    And that absolutely does not mean that this administration is effective at mitigating antisemitism because in my opinion they only amplify it with such actions, but the basis on which they are operating with this specific action is true and thus they kill two birds with one stone, they blackmail academia AND make sure to invalidate future outcries of antisemitism by making sure it will be labeled as nothing more than a mean to control/blackmail with.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 3, 2025, 11:26 PM

    @tao

    I'm sorry that these sorts of actions are happening to you and your colleagues across your nation. Academia is already often precarious and critical work not well understood by those outside of any given speciality can be easily destroyed by these actions. 😢

    On a personal note, I love your mention of collaborating at the preschool. One of my favourite things about Euler was his love of children and tendancy to work with one or more of them in his arms or the immediate surroundings. 🙂

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 2, 2025, 9:34 AM

    @tao That's so sad, what a crazy world. Perhaps it is time to look for moving out of that country and find another university to work in. How about UMons in Belgium? :)

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 2, 2025, 3:03 PM

    @tao Given your outsized standing in the mathematics community, it would be great if you would clearly call out the facism and extortion for what it is, rather than pretending that there is anything to debate here.

    Perhaps you can take advantage of your opportunity to address a national meeting of mathematicians next week to correct this.

    💬 0🔄 3⭐ 0
  • Aug 2, 2025, 9:47 PM

    @tao the paper you, Candes and Romberg wrote played a big role in my PhD journey.

    Very sorry to read that you are now personally affected. However, I don't get why you try so hard to downplay what is happening as something "debatable". Scholars and researchers from all over the globe call it by its name: fascism. They will burn down faculties because they just hate it. There is no debate, no negotiation. Just a fight that can't be avoided

    💬 0🔄 2⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 3, 2025, 10:44 PM

    @tao Citing "antisemitism" as motivation for wrecking funding for higher education and research nationwide is sickening to me as a Jew, amounts to blaming Jewry for the ongoing sabotage of America's greatest institutions and programs, and is itself an entirely antisemitic act.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • JamesLundbladJamesLundblad
    Aug 5, 2025, 5:59 PM

    @tao
    This has more to do with anti-intellectualism characteristic of authoritarian populist movements intended to weaken Western democracy than antisemitism.

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 6, 2025, 11:07 AM

    @tao The assault on higher education is part of the Project 2025 plan. Antisemitism - conflated with anti-Judaism, anti-Zionism and opposition to Israel's actions - is an excuse.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 7, 2025, 4:25 PM

    @tao

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki were obliterated exactly 80 years ago, because a great number of German and Italian scientists had their funding cut and their universities purged by fascist regimes, and had to flee to the US.

    These people don't understand the long term consequences of their actions.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Aug 10, 2025, 4:33 PM

    @tao I can empathize with the loss to science that this directive is causing. You are here debating its merits—or lack thereof, to be precise.

    There is one point in your post that I question: you state that antisemitism at UCLA is debatable. But the real question is whether it should be debated at all. Perhaps we should start with this: is antisemitism a moral wrong that also damages the very institution you are trying to protect—potentially with an even greater impact than this funding suspension? And if you agree with that premise, why should we not examine whether it is being practiced at UCLA?

    It cannot be dismissed out of hand, especially since a court has found such conduct to have occurred. That said, why should it fall on a professor to investigate such behavior? You are not an administrator, nor are you personally affected to the degree that would seem to warrant such a significant investment of your time and effort—unlike the funding cuts, which are directly affecting you and your colleagues.

    This post is intended as a challenge, not a criticism. Antisemitism could have been used by the administration as a pretext for cutting funding, but the UCLA community does not strengthen its position by either actively engaging in antisemitism or remaining indifferent to it. Do two wrongs make a right? No—but confronting one does not preclude confronting the other.
    Eradicating antisemitism at UCLA is both achievable and a worthwhile cause. Even a simple pledge could serve as a meaningful first step.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 2something@transfem.social
    Aug 18, 2025, 5:02 PM

    @Pitoe@mathstodon.xyz @tao@mathstodon.xyz

    Hey,
    When the Trump Administration uses the word "antisemitism," they are referring to people who oppose fascism. They aren't actually talking about discrimination against Jews (which is something the Trump Administration does itself). You aren't helping anyone by assuming good faith from the Trump Administration.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0