Login
You're viewing the discuss.systems public feed.
  • trashHeap :hehim: :verified_gay:trashheap@tech.lgbt
    Sep 24, 2026, 12:04 PM

    Fundamentally one person's "restrictions to LLM usage" is "codifying some acceptable LLM usage". They are two sides of the same coin.

    Acting like they are not; doesn't bring clarity to the discussion; It erases legitimate concerns in favor of bolstering the status quo of consuming LLM generated code by the project. #KDE

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • linear cannonlinear@nya.social
    Sep 24, 2026, 12:07 PM
    @trashheap@tech.lgbt one issue i keep seeing is that there are two groups of people, one of whom seems to assume that a lack of policy means "default accept" (mostly developers), and another of whom seems to assume that a lack of policy means "default deny".

    any change from a lack of policy is probably going to upset one of those groups.
    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • linear cannonlinear@nya.social
    Sep 24, 2026, 12:09 PM
    @trashheap@tech.lgbt there's also seemingly way more ignorance than i'd expect, of the fact that implementing or even talking about such a policy is going to make someone in one of those groups very angry.

    perhaps it's just wishful thinking combined with conflict avoidance. but that won't work here

    you simply cannot have this discussion at all in any open source project without being prepared to ban people you pissed off, which means you have to actually make a decision and decide who you want to exclude from your group
    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0