@Chapz This is a really legalistic take. That (a) they will explain if asked, and (b) we should ask them before judging. I don’t think either is true.

The point @MaddieM4 made, which is valid, is exactly this legalistic point: since their broad-brush proclamation about “No AI is a feature” can coexist with “AI is a contributor,” we all have to parse what they say far more finely. They lose trust.

If that’s the ODF’s stance (and I know you don’t speak for them, it’s just hypothetical), then we shouldn’t assume anything more that the black letter of what they write (or give them the benefit of doubts) because they’re reserving the right to be tediously legalistic.

@gvlx