As for the timetable numbering itself, it was just a running count, as was usual at the time. A notable change between the two was that Hermes gave the number 1 to the Bucharest-Brașov-Sighișoara-Teiuș-Cluj-Oradea trunk (and then the number 2 to the cross-border Oradea-Satu Mare-Karlovo nad Tisou (Korolevo)-Sighetul Marmației-Valea Vișeului, and number 3 to Teiuș-Deva-Arad-Curtici - provincionalism?), punting off the prioritized by the earlier, Bucharest-published 1926 timetable, Bucharest-Pitești-Craiova-Timișoara-Jimbolia trunk and its branches into the sixties. Meanwhile Moldavia (the historical region) was and remained last, despite having the three biggest cities of the country after Bucharest at the time (Seriously, Chișinău was literally the second-largest city of Romania), going by what Wikipedia says was in the census of 1930 (although the reasoning was probably that it was otherwise less developed). (Also Hungarians and Germans made up 12% of the country's population)
5/