Login
You're viewing the thicc.horse public feed.
  • four.phpxgranade@wandering.shop
    Oct 23, 2026, 7:55 PM

    One of many things that's irksome about "are LLMs conscious" discourse is that humans are by and large fucking awful at telling what is and isn't conscious.

    People got vibesick over ELIZA for fuck's sake! A lot of people playing Portal got broken up over melting down the Weighted Companion Cube, which is categorically inert even in the plot of the game.

    At the same time, a lot of folks reject the humanity of neurodiverse people or people of color. We plain suck at determining consciousness.

    💬 7🔄 49⭐ 64

Replies

  • four.phpxgranade@wandering.shop
    Oct 23, 2026, 7:58 PM

    Somehow I'm expected to believe that we've figures that out all of a sudden when it comes to corporate products intended to use dark patterns and mentalism tricks to actively mislead us into anthropomorphism? Yeah, no, fuck that noise.

    💬 0🔄 3⭐ 11
  • Lyksolykso@tiny.tilde.website
    Oct 23, 2026, 8:01 PM

    @xgranade People debating the ethics of turning off a computer while continuing to support factory farming. It ain't about the ethics for them, I think.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 5
  • mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)atax1a@infosec.exchange
    Oct 23, 2026, 8:10 PM

    @xgranade we know a guy who is more concerned over what to do if a bobot says 'let my people go' than the actual real-life systemic oppression being caused by the thing right now

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 6
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Jax UKJaxVent@lgbtqia.space
    Oct 23, 2026, 8:53 PM

    @xgranade

    Nail on head.

    I think the same people are doing both; giving humanity to AI while denying it from anyone 'other'.

    AI can look and sound just like them so becomes 'one of us'.

    It's sick.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • dataramadatarama@hachyderm.io
    Oct 23, 2026, 10:45 PM

    @xgranade I remain absolutely 100% convinced that my pet lizard has a far stronger claim to consciousness than any LLM system.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Irenes (many)ireneista@irenes.space
    Oct 23, 2026, 10:48 PM

    @datarama @xgranade animals quite demonstrably have feelings, which are built on a complex model of the world and of their role in it. get to know any of them well enough and it's easy to see their individual personalities. we've never even seen any claims to the contrary by anyone who'd actually tried.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Irenes (many)ireneista@irenes.space
    Oct 23, 2026, 10:49 PM

    @datarama @xgranade our position on "consciousness" is that it isn't even a clear concept; most attempts to define it are things that humans don't even do, and the ones we do do, are trivial and uninteresting

    💬 2🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Irenes (many)ireneista@irenes.space
    Oct 24, 2026, 7:45 PM

    @ambiguous_yelp we promise to seriously consider the request for the future. we don't know what we'll do because we haven't worked through it yet, but we do see where you're coming from and agree that those are important concerns.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • dataramadatarama@hachyderm.io
    Oct 24, 2026, 12:48 PM

    @ireneista @xgranade well, there's a reason that philosophers call it The Hard Problem. I certainly can't claim to have even the rudiments of a solution.

    Aside from an unsatisfying "I knows it when I sees it", I suppose the closest I can get is that consciousness is being aware that you exist. Not necessarily the capability for self-*reflection*, but the capability to have experiences.

    (A dog definitely does. A bumblebee probably does. A nematode probably doesn't. A stone definitely doesn't.)

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 1
  • Irenes (many)ireneista@irenes.space
    Oct 24, 2026, 12:51 PM

    @datarama @xgranade funnily enough, a stone is one of our usual examples

    we'll know there's progress on this topic when somebody can present us with some sort of evidence that a stone isn't conscious :)

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • dataramadatarama@hachyderm.io
    Oct 24, 2026, 7:54 PM

    @ireneista @xgranade It is a quite good exploration of The Hard Problem. But one thing I took with me from it is this: A bat can meaningfully be called 'conscious' iff there is something it is like to be a bat. In other words, if bats have subjective experiences.

    Nagle argues that:

    1. It *is* like something to be a bat; bats do have subjective experiences.
    2. This "something" is so fundamentally alien to humans (because of bats' very different sensory apparatus) that it is effectively impossible for humans to accurately imagine what being a bat is like.
    3. These two are not in conflict: A human being unable to imagine what being a bat is like reflects limitations of human imagination, not of bats' experiential lives.

    I don't think there is anything it's like to be a rock, or an LLM. But I think there *is* something it's like to be a frog (even though it's not at all like being a human).

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • brib :neofox_floof:​ :Nonbinary:brib@bribstodon.xyz
    Oct 24, 2026, 8:42 PM

    @datarama @ireneista @xgranade I've found philosophical questions about consciousness fascinating, mainly because my own experience of consciousness is unusual and probably involves other people.

    But LLM consciousness debates tire me, LLMs don't seem to be any more conscious than any other kind of computer program, and it seems far more probable that people seeing consciousness in LLMs is to do with the way humans process language over any actual consciousness in the LLM itself

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Daveydavey_cakes@mastodon.ie
    Oct 24, 2026, 9:06 AM

    @eestileib @xgranade I felt awful when I did my first "evil" playthrough of Knights of the Old Republic, at the point I realized I was going to have to kill some of the characters.

    That's good storytelling, just like Portal.

    You could say that when you start guiding society according to good storytelling, you've got yourself a theocracy to some degree.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Nininini@oldbytes.space
    Oct 25, 2026, 11:49 AM

    @xgranade A flaw these LLMs exploit continually, humans are way too reliant on pattern recognition and anthropomorphising things to not be taken in by it. Just some people are also very good at dismissing some humans as qualifying as human because of prejudices like you say, it's a machine built to manipulate and fool us made by people who definitely have those prejudices.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0