RE: https://mastodon.social/@colincornaby/117069185435215102
Holy shit, so the "Claude plagiarised an app" story is actually "Claude produced the same app twice when prompted to do so by two separate developers" 😅
RE: https://mastodon.social/@colincornaby/117069185435215102
Holy shit, so the "Claude plagiarised an app" story is actually "Claude produced the same app twice when prompted to do so by two separate developers" 😅
@nicklockwood You have to appreciate the consistency. :)
@nicklockwood to be fair, it probably also plagiarised an app, just not one we know about.
it does raise an interesting point though: in the age of LLMs and if people don't care about the sloppiness of the output, it means all software development companies are done for, aren't they? if your company pays both Claude and the dev team, the customer can just cut the middle man and pay Claude directly and get the same app, like this story.
it amazes me that devs haven't unionized against this.
They what?
Something found by accident on the digital waste pile of AI and cooked over twice in a different way can never be copyrighted. The greed that people have never ceases to amaze me…
@nicklockwood I think the more interesting aspect of this whole thing is how that plagiarised app even happened.
Dude built an astrology app which got rejected by apple, so he rewrites that into an astronomy app and slops out a ragebait blogpost complaining how evil apple is for rejecting his app and how we should all make web apps.
To quote: "an astronomy app I am working on that began as an astrology app". Seriously? I know that llm usage impairs thinking, but this is special..
@nicklockwood honestly, I’m much happier that the machine produces consistent output! Consistent, predictable outputs are ideal