Login
You're viewing the phpc.social public feed.

Replies

  • Dec 14, 2025, 6:21 PM

    In 2017, a study computed the rate of flow of the medieval glass in Westminster Abbey, and they “calculated that the maximum flow rate of medieval glass is 1 nm per billion years, making it impossible to observe in a human timescale.”

    💬 2🔄 0⭐ 4
  • Dec 14, 2025, 6:25 PM

    Most solids have a crystalline structure at the molecular level. The molecules form a rigid, repeating pattern. Glass does not have this property. It is amorphous; the molecules have no defined arrangement.

    💬 2🔄 0⭐ 5
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 2
  • Dec 14, 2025, 6:42 PM

    @heiglandreas Technically, I guess glass *does* flow, but it’s over billions of years.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 2
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • Dec 14, 2025, 9:26 PM

    @ramsey So what you are saying is … glass is a liquid 🤪

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • Dec 14, 2025, 6:37 PM

    @ramsey Due to it's disordered molecular structure, glass is best described as an amorphous solid. It does behave somewhat like a viscous liquid, so it's *theoretically* possible we could shoot a time lapse of glass succumbing to gravity and appearing to "melt", but it would take billions, not hundreds of years to film it!

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Dec 14, 2025, 10:32 PM

    @ramsey I had a high school art teacher once who insisted that glass was a liquid and that was why you saw ripples. He got very angry when I said it was rolled glass that unevenly refracted light, in fact so furious he slammed his stick down hard on his desk and shouted "it's a liquid!"

    Wasn't a very good art teacher, in various ways really.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1