Login
You're viewing the mstdn.social public feed.

Replies

  • Jul 8, 2026, 7:43 AM

    For Ernesto Mtz, this creates a conflict: AI satisfies the Builder side (building fast things) but it starves the Thinker side of the brain (solving really hard problems).

    In the end, he wonders if there is a way to make both sides happy. And so do I.

    💬 1🔄 2⭐ 0
  • Jul 8, 2026, 7:43 AM

    I share his "my thinker brain is starving" feeling, and honestly, I'm quite frustrated by what I see around me. People want to go fast, to show velocity, to rush into solutions. This isn't just a tech problem, it shows up in many domains.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 3
  • Jul 8, 2026, 7:43 AM

    But in some of these domains, accepting the pragmatic 70% will bite people later.

    Maybe it's a "me" problem, call me a perfectionist. But when I see people settle for the 70%, my brain already anticipates the chain of potential issues that follows.

    💬 1🔄 2⭐ 3
  • Jul 8, 2026, 7:43 AM

    It's the curse of having strong pattern recognition. Because of that, I often find myself asking to slow down, to at least take time to think through the problem and the solution. I don't always get that time.

    I don't think I need 100% to satisfy my thinker brain.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 3
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 1
  • Jul 8, 2026, 7:50 AM

    @stephaniewalter related to so much of that until I got to

    “At the end of the day, I am a Builder. I like building things. The faster I build, the better.”

    The build-ing, as in the doing of the build, is what I enjoy. From a commercial perspective speed *should* come into it. But striving for quality is my happy place and that takes the time that it takes

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 4