You're viewing the mstdn.social public feed.

Toni Aittoniemigimulnautti@mastodon.green
Jun 28, 2026, 6:30 AM
@DJGummikuh @alice I somewhat hesitantly raise my voice also, that I’m not entirely against discovery aids, but at the same time if those are found to cause people harm, the community of fediverse can choose to come together block them on the server level.
But I do also call for some level of organic experimentation to be encouraged, as designs by committee are vulnerable to other kinds of abuse: capture by large actors working against the small.
💬 2🔄 0⭐ 4

Replies

DJGummikuhDJGummikuh@mastodon.social
Jun 28, 2026, 6:33 AM
@gimulnautti @alice couldn't agree more! I am absolutely not against blocking people for doing something percieved to be immoral, even if it is just the perception of individuals. This is a vslid strategy to express dissent. I just find it important to raise that there are more nuanced sides to this story than the replies of quite some participants in this discussion suggest
💬 0🔄 0⭐ 4
🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄)alice@lgbtqia.space
Jun 28, 2026, 7:07 AM
@gimulnautti @DJGummikuh again, *consent matters*.
There is *no* other argument here.
It's not consent if you violate trust first and then notify me that I was violated after the fact.
💬 1🔄 0⭐ 7
Toni Aittoniemigimulnautti@mastodon.green
Jun 28, 2026, 10:58 AM
@alice @DJGummikuh It is not a question of understanding the issue. Merely notifying that while consent matters, absolute consent necessitates absolute prearrangement of details, potentially leaving no room for good surprises.
Where is the space for argument, or ’courtship’? And how open is that space? These are difficult questions, and people’s tolerance in those spaces and how they’re defined seem to differ somewhat.
💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0