Login
You're viewing the mstdn.social public feed.
  • May 31, 2026, 12:35 AM

    watching the worst AI bros who all sound like polite nazis run a victory lap cause jqwik slightly softened its anti-LLM message from “delete all jqwik code” to “just fuck off” is a really good reminder to never do anything nice for these fucking assholes

    you do not in fact have to take advice from guys who only know about you because they’re doing raids for hacker news or one of the chans (same difference) whose every word is dripping in contempt

    💬 4🔄 74⭐ 164

Replies

  • May 31, 2026, 12:47 AM

    repeat after me: “we are not currently entertaining suggestions or discussion regarding our policy against LLM contributions”

    💬 1🔄 25⭐ 97
  • May 31, 2026, 12:54 AM

    oh no, hackchan might flood your issues with discussion points they know damn well don’t make sense because their goal isn’t to help you or anyone else, their goal is to burn out your resistance

    kick them the fuck out. you owe them nothing.

    💬 4🔄 25⭐ 92
  • May 31, 2026, 12:57 AM

    and I have to emphasize: I’m not blaming the jqwik maintainer for this, they’re doing the best they can to oppose this crap and getting raided fucking sucks every time

    I’m pointing this out as something to examine and learn from, because it’s possible to defuse a raid if you know what you’re seeing

    💬 1🔄 8⭐ 60
  • Jun 1, 2026, 12:01 PM

    @zzt it's much easier to see what's happening from the outside than from the inside, tho

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 2
  • 💬 1🔄 2⭐ 14
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • May 31, 2026, 8:45 AM

    @zzt indeed I had one tell me his pointless change was to prevent "crashing the compiler" 🤦‍♂️ I was polite, I'll probably just open with GTFO next time.

    💬 0🔄 4⭐ 5
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 6
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 7
  • May 31, 2026, 5:39 AM

    @zzt they should have gone with "silently introduce obfuscated security holes and post them on pastebin"

    💬 0🔄 3⭐ 0
  • May 31, 2026, 4:32 PM

    @zzt l believe that the best way to deal with objections to a Code of Conduct is permabans. Objections to contribution guidelines that are philosophic probably should be treated the same. The community damage caused by inflamed “debate” and rules lawyering far outweighs any potential gains from the discussion. If you don’t like the social aspects of the community feel free to hard fork and leave us alone.

    💬 0🔄 5⭐ 9