Login
You're viewing the frontrange.co public feed.
  • Oct 22, 2026, 4:07 PM

    @blogdiva This is also why experts recommend away from any kind of touchscreen voting device in favor of optical scan hand marked paper ballots (except for voters who require assistive tech).

    But that's a battle for another day; no county can change its voting equipment at this point in the election.

    💬 3🔄 11⭐ 33

Replies

  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • Oct 22, 2026, 4:45 PM

    @mattblaze @blogdiva
    Hand-marked optical scan balloting is, or should be, the gold standard for voting systems. It becomes (comparatively) easy to independently verify and recount vote totals, even in the event that the scanners are unavailable or their software is in doubt.

    Assistive devices to mark ballots for visually impaired voters are a valuable adjunct.

    💬 1🔄 6⭐ 10
  • Oct 22, 2026, 4:54 PM

    As I remember it, Washington State government had a big consultation with our earlier computer boom notables when planning our current voting system. 1990s?

    The techies were _completely_ in favor of paper ballots (and simple ones!) for both money and security reasons.

    @n1xnx @mattblaze @blogdiva

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 2
  • Oct 22, 2026, 5:11 PM
    Electronic voting is more complex, which I'd say is generally a bad thing. More moving parts, more opportunity for failure (or sabatoge).

    But it has to be open source.

    Nobody is talking about that. They're all talking about voter error, and machine failure, and sabatoge, but not that these giant voting machine companies are allowed to install complete black boxes, secret code, secret hardware, with no way for anyone to tell they're even counting your vote.

    All machines need to be open source and open spec, independently inspected and verified. Until then, the USA is not a democracy.
    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0