Login
You're viewing the front-end.social public feed.
  • Nov 9, 2026, 4:09 AM

    @hacks4pancakes Seems perfectly reasonable for a lot of things to be on A network, or even a few networks. Fine to have them on REDACTED connected to a bigger REDACTED connected to a REDACTED in a REDACTED, routed to a REDACTED mounted to the wall in the REDACTED, connected to a pair of REDACTEDs under a REDACTED in the REDACTED. Would be nice if they didn't need to be on the internet, though.

    💬 1🔄 2⭐ 3

Replies

  • 💬 0🔄 4⭐ 7
  • 💬 0🔄 3⭐ 1
  • Nov 9, 2026, 9:21 AM

    @Heterokromia I mean, the only equipment that even slightly resembled centrifuges in that place was the big REDACTED, but those were manually operated. OK, granted, messing with the ladder logic for the REDACTED and REDACTED could probably cause some expensive problems. @hacks4pancakes

    💬 0🔄 2⭐ 1
  • 💬 1🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Nov 9, 2026, 9:55 AM

    @Heterokromia @hacks4pancakes Crap, at first, I could have been describing any of thousands of businesses, utilities, or other facilities. Mentioning that it was a REDACTED narrowed it down to maybe 20 REDACTED in the region, and how many of them REDACTED? I guess you get a gold star for social engineering, and I get an embarrassing reminder to shut the fuck up. I even told you what type of REDACTED they use, along with where the REDACTED is located.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 1
  • Nov 9, 2026, 10:37 AM

    @Heterokromia @hacks4pancakes If I were sober, I'd probably have just deleted all this crap, or maybe done the whole of the Fediverse a favor and deleted my account. Again. I'm very much not sober, so I'm leaving this mess in case somebody wants a cautionary tale's worth of screencaps for presentation slides at one of the less fun security conferences, maybe RSAC or Gartner, or something.

    💬 0🔄 1⭐ 2