Login
You're viewing the front-end.social public feed.
  • Richard PennerArpie4Math@mathstodon.xyz
    Apr 19, 2023, 4:40 AM

    Doc 58 is an amended version of Doc 51 from #StabilityAI

    storage.courtlistener.com/reca

    • Footnote 1 changed from
    "Stability AI consents to personal jurisdiction in this District solely for purposes of this action. Stability AI’s participation in this litigation should not be construed as consent to personal jurisdiction in this District for any other purpose or as a waiver of its right to contest personal jurisdiction in any other action."
    to
    "Stability AI consents to personal jurisdiction in this District solely for purposes of this action and any others raising substantially similar claims arising under the Copyright Act, DMCA and/or Lanham Act. Stability AI’s participation in this litigation should not be construed as consent to personal jurisdiction in this District for any other purpose or as a waiver of its right to contest personal jurisdiction in any other action."

    I'm not a lawyer, but this feels like there may be some land mine in case law if they don't phrase their agreement to personal jurisdiction is a specific manner.

    Doc 50 is a motion to strike by #DeviantArt the California Right-Of-Publicity claims which they think are forbidden by California Anti-SLAPP law and the #1stAmendment to the US Constitution.

    It's such a good idea #Midjourney and #StabilityAI jump in (Docs 54 and 59, respectively.)

    storage.courtlistener.com/reca

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0