@dbattistella "Planned obsolescence" ascribes intent that usually isn't actually there — and shifts the focus away from what actually is.
Most things use cheaper materials not to make them die and force you to buy new ones, but to shave a tiny bit off their costs and increase their profit margins. Why does this distinction matter? In part it doesn't — the profit margin consideration we can't fix on our side. In part it does — the markets keep choosing price over quality.
Enshittification is more extreme: they're not trying to kill off most things. Again, they're trying to make them more profitable. Things like using private data for marketing produce profits so they do it.
Markets, as a whole, have not put their foot down. Some of that is on us as a whole*.