Login
You're viewing the discuss.systems public feed.
  • Apr 24, 2023, 1:10 AM

    @RL_Dane Agreed!

    When it comes to purity spirals I strive to avoid being judgemental unless they're striving to pull me further down, or if they're trying to out-pure the FSF. That gets an eyeroll!

    And one major line defining "fossbros" to me is opposing usability improvements in free software. Or the "just fork it" or "how dare you forked it" attitudes!

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Apr 24, 2023, 1:29 AM

    @RL_Dane I guess what it boils down to for me: Don't object to others modifying the software for their needs. That doesn't have to impact you, leaves me wondering if those saying this knows what they're advocating.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Apr 24, 2023, 6:03 AM

    @RL_Dane I was generalizing a bit, I don't think most people saying that realise it. But heard of the GIMP for GLIMPSE? Heard of the Audacity fork Tenacity?

    Those are some high profile cases!

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Apr 24, 2023, 4:33 PM

    @RL_Dane Think what you like about the rationals, but I whole heartedly defend anyone's right to fork! That's what The Four Freedoms boil down to, isn't it?

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Apr 24, 2023, 4:50 PM

    @alcinnz

    Absolutely! We can kvetch about the dilution and fragmentation of the FOSS "marketplace," but you can't restrict that freedom an iota without inherently damaging FOSS.

    In fact, I oppose any and all efforts to introduce power and coercion into FOSS, including using dependencies to force people to use a particular init system or libc, or using libraries to prevent modification of the visual style of a desktop.
    I think those are crappy. :P

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0