Login
You're viewing the discuss.systems public feed.

Replies

  • 💬 3🔄 1⭐ 0
  • May 28, 2018, 11:30 PM

    << and the MIT Instrumentation Labs' antibodies flooded in to destroy the invader with critiques and reports negative of the IBM report. >>

    lol programmers then just like today

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 4🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 2🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • May 28, 2018, 11:36 PM

    @natecull please tell me they at least had a bunch of toggle switches somewhere in case it got wiped so houston could read it back to them and they could program it back in

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Jan 4, 2023, 6:21 PM

    @jk @natecull it was CORE ram, which is nonvolatile. You can still recover the databits in the old core planes you find on ebay, but you have ONE (1) chance to get them right. If your sense amps dont work and cant read them, it's done. The cores can only be read destructively and need immediate reprogramming to retain the value.

    If you already know this please forgive me, I just think it's cool info that will be interesting for someone else.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Jan 4, 2023, 8:50 PM

    @natecull I have fond memories of a system that I created a boot disk for which rewrote the operating system to all things to do with bunnies. To RUN something you had to HOP it, etc. I would boot the computer with my disk and then watch my friend try to figure out what I’d done. We had many laughs at that.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Jul 9, 2023, 12:02 AM

    @natecull I was a coop in Astrionics lab. The LVDC guys were down the hall. LVDC did more guidance and nav then engine control.
    Those guys bragged that they hit their orbits within 50 feet on every Apollo flight.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 28, 2024, 10:35 AM

    @natecull

    From my reading, 18-bit and 36-bit architectures were popular through the '60s and early '70s. Computer designs didn't really settle down to power-of-2 word sizes until the mid-70s.

    There were weirder sets of numbers in use too - 24-bit, 30-bit, 48-bit, 60-bit, etc.

    💬 3🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 28, 2024, 1:02 PM

    @CliftonR @natecull My university was given an old CDC machine and we nascent C.S. types were told to learn assembly programming on its strange 60 bit architecture. It had its own 6 bit ASCII so it could fit 10 characters in the accumulator.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 28, 2024, 10:08 PM

    @mkj @natecull

    Yep, I just summarized by giving some of the more popular ones.

    Wikipedia lists some really oddball ones - 25 bit, 26 bit (from IBM!), and even 31 bit!

    That last was a crippled 32-bit computer made for selling into the Soviet bloc when selling them 32-bit CPUs was prohibited due to military applications.

    Yes, I fell down a Wiki rabbit hole double-checking my facts before replying.

    💬 1🔄 1⭐ 0
  • Oct 29, 2024, 6:54 AM

    @CliftonR @mkj @natecull

    Engineers.... Somebody sets up an obstruction (be it Mother Nature, our boss, or Parliament), and the first thing we do is figure out how to bypass/circumvent/sidestep it in order to get to the real problem we're working on.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 12, 2026, 8:05 PM

    @CliftonR @natecull

    IIRC my work on raw GPS data down links, decades ago (for some French official agencies), GPS words were 5 x 6 bits "sextets" instead of octets (30 bits words)

    The sextets bit ordering was in the opposite direction of the endianness of the 30 bits word.
    Required some translation routines to-from 64 bits sytems (Linux).
    Was a 24/365 monitoring system providing data for geodesy post processing (RINEX) and to some Aviation Security agencies (eventual proof of GPS spoofing)

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0