The existence of syntactic sugar implies the subsequent syntactic diabetes due to overuse of it.
Which language would fall in that category?
The existence of syntactic sugar implies the subsequent syntactic diabetes due to overuse of it.
Which language would fall in that category?
Damn you guys didn't hesitate on throwing Ruby in the taffy machine LMAO
@NullTheFool Ruby (my claim to authority here: I wrote the first essentially complete, independent reimpementation of a Ruby lexer in the language's entire existence)
@NullTheFool I quit using it after that
@NullTheFool ruby
@eniko She's canonically diabetic in my CodeGals lore now, hope you're happy
@NullTheFool yes :D
@NullTheFool have you seen parse.y. HAVE YOU
@whitequark WHAT THE FUCK
@NullTheFool i had to commission a translation from a book in Japanese just to figure out wtf the lexer is doing. the book was second edition. in the second edition the author solemnly apologized for not getting things right in the first one
maybe, just maybe, it's too complex
(they made it so much worse since)
@whitequark Considering Matz is using Claude to develop Ruby nowadays I don't know if I wanna see where the next iteration of that goes to...
@NullTheFool this was before Claude, 2021-era
@whitequark I know, I DON'T WANNA SEE HOW WORSE THIS COULD GET
@whitequark @NullTheFool the SQLite's parse.y?
@Ronflaix @NullTheFool Ruby
@whitequark @NullTheFool and I was thinking SQLite's seemed big.
Let me join Null in quacking WTF loud.