Magnus Ahltorpahltorp@mastodon.nu
Oct 13, 2026, 8:35 AM@Noisecolor @chiraag @grumpygamer Yes, but if you don't understand what you are describing, you haven't discovered anything.
Replies
NoisecolorNoisecolor@toot.communityOct 13, 2026, 9:44 AM@ahltorp
Semantics. The content has value.
@chiraag @grumpygamer- Magnus Ahltorpahltorp@mastodon.nuOct 13, 2026, 9:48 AM
@Noisecolor I’m glad you’re starting to describe what words mean.
- NoisecolorNoisecolor@toot.communityOct 13, 2026, 10:30 AM
@ahltorp That was the original point. Can content have value when its written by AI.
Passwordsarehard4passwordsarehard4@mastodon.socialOct 13, 2026, 10:37 AM@Noisecolor @ahltorp there was a lot of good content in that report that linked autism to vaccines. It wasn’t the conclusion, or any of the summaries. It wasn’t the methodology or critical thinking, but many of the datapoints were correct. The author didn’t u see stand the information so the paper wasn’t good, regardless of the data used inside of it. If it can’t be trusted you can’t say it’s good content.
- NoisecolorNoisecolor@toot.communityOct 13, 2026, 11:08 AM
@passwordsarehard4 @ahltorp
It can be when its verified. No matter how it was generated. - Passwordsarehard4passwordsarehard4@mastodon.socialOct 13, 2026, 1:18 PM
@Noisecolor @ahltorp if you have to recreate a report to verify its contents each time, the AI didn’t generate it you did. The unverified report was useless, it had to be translated by you to turn it into something that could be trusted and used. The AI output is raw ore with 20% impurities, you are judging the results after you smelt it down.