@pixel Nope, that’s pretty much it.

If Matt wanted to “force” other people who work on his project, it shouldn’t have been open source and it also wouldn’t have grown to be as big as it is. He is trying to have his cake and eat it too.

Every decision you make is a trade-off. Some for-profit company can come and do whatever without contributing based on licensing. Don’t want them to do that? Decide that before making something open -source.

What he *is* proving is that any non-profit project without independent governance with a for-profit arm should be considered immediately suspect for whatever long term statements are made… *cough* OpenAI *cough*.