Login
You're viewing the y.diskcat.com public feed.
  • Luzifer van RattusLuziferVanRattus@pounced-on.me
    Nov 5, 2026, 10:36 AM

    @dancrescentwolf because in my opinion, sadly people see often art as consumer product. What, in a really dry view it is in the scene.
    What often is not seen what goes into the art, to make it art, to make it something special. This is hidden from the commissioner. He gets some wipes and communication, bit bit the emotions we have during the creation. He sees pictures, he pays, he wants picture. The faster the better.

    This is my opinion and flawed as hell, but my only explanation that keeps me sain

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Luzifer van RattusLuziferVanRattus@pounced-on.me
    Nov 5, 2026, 10:46 AM

    @dancrescentwolf to add to that because my brain is Fragmented like a Seagate 50gb.

    Indonnit say the customer is wrong, but you get what you pay for. And here is wher I agree wholeheartedly with your unfairness.

    I lay you, I get YOU
    emotion, thought and method and experience condensed into your art. It's unique and you flavored.
    And that's why I want something from you.

    And here I blame the modern consumer lointif view, even if it's in its baseline a valid want of instant gratification.

    I want art. I want it now. And I want it for free (or dirt-cheap)what I do not understand is thi, how i would want to PAY for someone, who enters words onto a machine and it does things. Everyone capable of forming coherent sentences can do that, and here is where my mind breaks. That's the ultimate brick wall my mind runs into. Of you pay for AI art you perfectly could have achieved yourself, why not pay for art you could not create yourself?

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1
  • DanCrescentWolfdancrescentwolf@pounced-on.me
    Nov 5, 2026, 10:51 AM

    @LuziferVanRattus yeah that's also going through my mind.

    so either these people (the one paying) don't fucking care, are way too lazy or they are just literally stupid.

    most of the 'artists' using slop for their art, don't say so, so maybe peopel don't recognize it as such?
    but how can you not tell when they drew a stick figure the other week but suddenly their anatomy is perfect?

    I only know of 1 'artist' who is open about their AI usage honestly
    The others I'm referring to aren't referencing it but it's so obvious it's mindboggling to me how others (especially the commissioners) can't see that

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Luzifer van RattusLuziferVanRattus@pounced-on.me
    Nov 5, 2026, 10:58 AM

    @dancrescentwolf yes, this is kind of a breaking point for me to.

    Use of AI tools obfuscation.

    I, to a certain degree can understand the argument AI is a tool(it is) but, and here comes my thoughts and values.

    A tool that takes decisions from me to the tool, makes the Produkt Not mine, or entirely mine. Especially as GenAi is at the end a statistical approximation of a grafik that the tool thinks is wanted.
    So I get a common accepted piece of data that one claimed to have made himself. I cannot and do not support that thought, as I put it equal to Akkademic dishonesty.
    Of one uses AI in its art, and labels it. Fine, nothing I can do about it but being annoyed. Sadly -_-
    But obfuscate this and lrope believe it's genuine man made? Uhhh... A lot of thoughts, non of em pleasant.

    TL;Dr: why do they pay for shit that's made by boring, common smallest denomination of "style" pressed into 16 promtvomits. I hate AI art sellers ..

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Luzifer van RattusLuziferVanRattus@pounced-on.me
    Nov 5, 2026, 11:18 AM

    @dancrescentwolf I like to stay more... Moderate. But often I encounter that I make a silut Statements, that needs explanation or differentiation to see where my angle for the more brutal statement comes from. And then... My thoughts split and I go on like a bad multi thread ..

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0