@dianaprobst I'm talking about Meta's funding from the other comment. In Anthropic's case I can see the point since people don't like them and they want to buy social acceptance through Blender, and that can still be avoided. But for most companies donating to open source, the alternative is that Blender gets less funding (->"becomes a less useful tool fool millions of people") and the big company pays another big tech company instead.
@aronkvh *sigh*
It'd be great if the world valued different things, huh? "This big company is slightly less bad than that big company," is a bad choice to have to make.
@aronkvh I am not advocating for Blender to reject either Meta or Anthropic's funding.
I am saying that Meta has much more blood on their hands.
I don't agree with a position that sees Anthropic (an evil company) as less objectionable than Meta. Meta has inflicted orders of magnitude more harm on people than Anthropic has.
Even if someone can excuse genocide, fascism, etc. and only cares about opposing AI, Meta is a larger AI company than Anthropic.
@lynndotpy Looks like we're on the same page then