Oooh... so the UNITED NATIONS REJECTED THE ELECTION RESULTS!
Hmm... that surely doesn't bode well... Ok, let's consult the [14] source, then: https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-crackdown-detentions-united-nations-human-rights-cd2555ec2255f6a804a671f8723bc15b
a fucking AP hit piece???? That's your source, Wikipedians? And NOWHERE it does say that the election results were rejected by the U.N. !!!
"While the U.N. group praised the logistic organization of the voting, it harshly criticized the CNE for flouting local rules and announcing Maduro the winner without tabulated results from each of the 30,000 polling booths nationwide"
ok ok, now can we please have access to the UN report? Oh, AP doesn't cite any author's name of the said report 😑
Give.us.the.fucking.UN.report.
FFS, this is harder to find than Trump's pedo tapes.
All I found was this "interim report"🤨 https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4062104
Reading it, you'll find it's globally positive (panel members liberty, over all organisation, etc..)
The harshest critic is point #13, about the results publication without (then) any poll tabulation. Sadly, the panel departed too early: "After that moment, the Panel was regrettably – and despite a request sent by Note Verbale – not able to meet the CNE Board before the Panel’s departure"
So why did they leave so soon, not even 2 weeks after the election ?
So, in conclusion:
Wikipedia is lying, the United Nations did not reject Maduro 2024 reelection.
The U.N. final panel report is not accessible, this is strange. Hypothesis: the man was not pleased by the direction the report was taking so it was axed.
So, No, Maduro is not a dictator... Rats.
Bonus content: someone in the CIA wrote that Stalin, too, was not a dictator 😜 https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00810A006000360009-0.pdf
décidément...