Login
You're viewing the slime.global public feed.
  • Sep 25, 2026, 3:37 AM
    @glyph @eevee Don't mind me, just adding my 2 cents here, ymmv:

    As someone whose earlier days on the internet were full of both well-meaning, but also rule-lawyering, let me say this: The appropriate response is to say, "What you're doing is not appreciated. Rules are the runes to describe the spirit of the rule. Stop trying to test the rules or you will be removed." You address the behavior, not the incident, and you give a wide enough reason. That way, when it's just someone whose flavor of ND leaves them unable to process social cues correctly, you've given them framework for the behavior, rather than acting as point defense. And then if they violate, you remove them and dust your hands off.
    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Sep 25, 2026, 3:45 AM

    @silverstar @eevee I am rarely the unilateral moderator in the unpleasant situations I have seen. Honestly rarely a moderator at all, usually in some kind of advisory capacity. the problem is not explaining to the problematic person, but the stress involved in getting a diverse moderation team on board with this type of orientation. I suspect it would be easier nowadays, but certainly in our collective resist-lib era it was challenging to explain this

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 1