like you've defined a gender that's "transgender woman but not a woman and not transgender"
that's literally nothing
like you've defined a gender that's "transgender woman but not a woman and not transgender"
that's literally nothing
can anyone explain why "femboy" is a distinct gender from "boy who wears whatever the fuck he wants because there aren't actually fashion police"
i have been doing a bunch of reading about the history of computation (in e.g. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-96242-4) and one striking thing is how dedicated everyone involved was to base 10. even after everyone realized in the mid-1930s or so that "hey it's actually way easier to do computer math with binary numbers" they still went on designing machines for decades that exclusively used binary-coded decimal schemes in their *internal representations* of numbers, not just input/output. wild
If you haven't been around bigots enough, you may not know this, so this will be a reminder for some and news to others.
Bigots don't repeat slander because they think it's literally true.
Bigots repeat slander because if it was true, it would justify the actions that they would like to take (or see taken on their behalf.)
This is why attacking the truth of the slander they're repeating does nothing. It just exhausts us, platforms them, and they'll continue repeating it anyway.
A few years back, a school in the Dominican Republic was designated as one of the country's best. Their inspiring response: to think deeply about the whole idea of pitting schools (or kids or teachers) against one another. As a result, they ended up respectfully declining the award: https://teachingexperiment.com/2013/09/top-100-schools/
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@atax1a/110707598233674691
because aella is in the discourse again, we must remind you that she is a skull-calipers-type scientific racist and when we say this it tends to provoke arguments in the shape of "no! she's this OTHER kind of scientific racist", which seems rather beside the point
There’s a newly launched drive to unionize Harvard’s professional librarians and when the organizers asked us what issues we might want them to address, I said I wanted protection against being required to incorporate AI hallucinations in my work, a profound violation of my professional ethics. https://aftermath.site/ai-resistance-tips-workforce-llm-workers/
Please help if you can: I am working with some students who are studying programmers' beliefs about software engineering folklore. If you can spare a few minutes to answer the question in https://survey.bth.se/survey/2545, we would be very grateful. We would also be grateful if you could circulate the survey link to colleagues and friends - we would like to reach as diverse a demographic as possible. Thanks in advance.
between the weird donut lips, the bizarre fake tans, the braids, and the BBLs, people will literally do anything to seem black-adjacent other than love support and be in community with black people lmfao
I'd hate to be a complex piece of lab equipment being retired, hoping for a peaceful retirement surrounded by caring autistic transgender women, and then the crate opens and it's NileRed
Fellow chronically ill people, what things are you doing to Enjoy the Summer*, within your capacity? I need inspiration.
*With an understanding that this isn't possible for everyone and we won't all be able to do the same things. I'm trying to feel less depressed about the whole thing. I feel like if I can't be working I should at least be able to enjoy some of the weather.
«I don’t need a stair-climbing wheelchair that costs $30,000 and requires a maintenance crew. I need better doorknobs and or a ramp. But a ramp is boring. You can't make investors have a hard on for a ramp that doesn't connect to the cloud. You can’t give a TED Talk about a ramp. You can’t get venture capital funding for a slightly wider doorframe.»
propaganda isn't gonna come screaming to you, with a gajillion light-up arrows and obvious slogans calling to itself. no. fascism is a thing that loves camouflaging itself into leftist rags. terfs and swerfs are like this, tankies are like this, antisemitic "leftists", misogynistic "debate bros" are like this, and so on and so on and so on
Age controls don't protect children. It's authoritarianism. It's taking their rights away. Their rights to access knowledge and to communicate with others. Nothing changes magically in one's brain on your 16th or 18th birthday. You can't possibly learn media literacy and how to navigate the digital world without access to it.
The plans of many western governments for age limits will lead to generations with incredibly bad media literacy, that will be extremely gullible by scams and deep fakes.
another zine that i am often recommending bc of its heartbreaking relevancy.
it applies to big organizations, social scenes, and sometimes even tiny affinity groups. and too often gets repeated due to unexamined internalized misogyny as well.
printable zine versions of this are pretty easy to find online, but you can also just read the text here: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/courtney-desiree-morris-why-misogynists-make-great-informants
We're just supposed to believe that they invented a machine that can tell you how to beat the market
And they're begging us to use it, not hiding it as the greatest secret of all time
That's how little they think of us
[anton ego jpg] i do not provide an "EXPECTED SALARY". i send in the app, you provide ME your salary bar for the role, and if you waste MY fucking time with little mind games before you give me a contract, I DON'T SUBMIT THE APP!
@forestine on the slope to "any form of agency that impacts other people is manipulation..."
Well done, you have noticed you live in a society of social animals
Sigh
@faithisleaping yes, i think the soundbyte quality of it is what really bothers me because it makes it out to be intentional and malicious. putting into context why it is harmful in relationships i think could be done much more effectively
like am i manipulating the tiger not to eat me? technically sure. but is that useful framing? how about focusing on the fact that there isn't a tiger anymore and it hurts people to be treated as one?
people pleasing when you're terrified that someone might find you a bad person, due to trauma induced hypervigilence or to avoid harm
then told actually people pleasing is something bad people do, really makes ya think huh
no! this framing is dogshit