the paradox is that having *practically unverifiable definitions* on words that are used in *casual social settings* is a lie.
we can't keep a notion of sex (and male and female) that isn't cultural and social, not because of bodies, not because of science, not because of normativity (which we could all go into and find paradox there too) but firstly because of language and the way we use words. the cop at the airport security scan has pressed the F button when i pass the portal. Dr have asked my trans women friends if they had their period or if they're on a contraceptive. there are so many examples.
trans women can change their genitalia. when we take hormones our balance is the same than menopaused cis women on hormones because we take the same thing. if anyone would say but what about chromosome i think i'd just look at them in the eyes in silence and whisper... are the chromosomes in the room with us right now? and the uterus... oh my god not this one. sure defining the female sex with the ability to bear a child could lead to nothing wrong for woman on a large political scale right? if we do produce such a dichotomy between gender and sex we ends up with the same transphobic arguments just now postponed to the notion of sex, that ultimately can produce violence on both cis and trans woman.
