Login
You're viewing the mstdn.social public feed.
  • Cegorachdat@social.g33ky.de
    Jun 22, 2026, 4:26 PM

    the CE label really isn't the good example you think it is

    also energy labels? I'm all for those energy classes and normed labels… but then there was that A++++-Fuckup?

    …and that was solved by making the previous A into a C and the previous A++ into A? And the label looked the same? Because making it distinct would be too obvious?

    All I'm saying is: your idea might be okay, but the examples are stupid

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Plan-A̵̛͈̬̥̿͋̓͛̕zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org
    Jun 22, 2026, 4:27 PM
    @dat @EUCommission It is all scam!!! there are no other models!
    Same for housing, just pay the expert a sum and he gives it an A to your building's isolation is how things work but EU commision wants to enforce that even and add even more.
    I swear each day this account posts it makes me regret to be born in EU frankly if I was rich I would leave now immediatly
    Post this on W and leave us alone, frankly daily I read some idiotic add of you> imma block you and ya server.
    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Cegorachdat@social.g33ky.de
    Jun 22, 2026, 5:02 PM

    No, it's not all scam.

    Energy classes for refrigerators and light fixtures actually kinda work. Only the names are stupid.

    Yes, building energy classes are total bullshit.

    It sometimes works out and sometimes it doesn't. The way how the criteria for such labels designed is literally "design by committee". So obviously there's a lot of those things around that are just stupid bureaucracy and we have nobody going around to actually remove such things.

    But claiming "it's all scam" doesn't help. That's just as useless.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0