Login
You're viewing the mstdn.social public feed.
  • Mar 21, 2026, 5:46 PM

    rich people couldn't colonize poetry the way they colonized visual art because poetry can't be kept in restrictive galleries or sold exclusively to private collections

    there's no scarcity to manufacture, no object to speculate on. A rich person can't buy the ONLY copy of a poem

    so the colonization vector didn't work. you can't gatekeep language the way you can gatekeep a canvas in a climate controlled room. which means poetry could only rot from the inside. the MFA programs, the journals nobody reads, the poets talking to other poets in an increasingly small room

    but physical art? a painting? a sculpture? a physical object in a physical space? that's perfect for wealth capture. you can restrict access. you can create artificial scarcity. the gallery system is a containment model. keep art scarce, keep prices high, keep the definition of "good" under the control of people with money

    💬 2🔄 6⭐ 15

Replies

  • Mar 21, 2026, 6:03 PM

    @Taweret

    Luke-warm take: All art is colonized by status seekers. Some art forms are more easily monetized than others, which makes the caste system more visible, but it’s there whether you see it or not, whether you understand the art or not or can perceive its constraints.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Mar 21, 2026, 11:01 PM

    @Taweret physical art also happens to be great for laundering money. Which also drives up the value beyond any actual merits to the art itself, creating a market demand for more and more art that is merely good enough to not get a second look when someone drops a couple million dollars on it.

    💬 1🔄 1⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 1⭐ 0