Login
You're viewing the mastodonapp.uk public feed.
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    The Inquiry explicitly rejects the claim that a “protective ring” was thrown around care homes “right from the start”. It says that claim did not accurately reflect the lack of action in March and the first half of April 2020.
    3/10

    💬 1🔄 5⭐ 13

Replies

  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    Governments already knew care-home residents were exceptionally vulnerable to respiratory viruses. Yet protective measures were introduced long after Covid had taken hold. The Inquiry’s verdict is blunt: action came too late.
    4/10

    💬 1🔄 4⭐ 7
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    Around 25,000 people were discharged from English hospitals into care homes between 17 March and 15 April 2020. Many across the UK were discharged without tests because testing capacity was inadequate.
    5/10

    💬 1🔄 3⭐ 7
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    The Inquiry accepts that hospitals needed beds. The damning failure was that England, Wales and Northern Ireland initially failed to advise isolation of everyone discharged into care homes. It calls this a “significant omission”.
    6/10

    💬 1🔄 4⭐ 12
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    By mid-March 2020 there was enough evidence of possible asymptomatic transmission to justify a precautionary approach. The Inquiry says all hospital admissions to care homes should have been isolated. Scotland introduced this advice earlier.
    7/10

    💬 1🔄 2⭐ 8
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    Governments did not even know which care homes could isolate residents safely. Nor were alternative isolation facilities ready. Exercise Cygnus had identified the need for social-care capacity planning in 2016, but the work remained unfinished.
    8/10

    💬 1🔄 6⭐ 10
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:39 AM

    Care homes were urged to accept admissions to free up hospital beds. The Inquiry finds that official wording could create false reassurance that untested or asymptomatic Covid-positive residents could be accommodated safely. Some managers felt they could not refuse.
    9/10

    💬 1🔄 2⭐ 8
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:40 AM

    Care workers were given guidance that was detached from reality, including advice to remain two metres from people while providing intimate care. PPE shortages left some working with unsuitable equipment or none at all. The report calls this “wholly unacceptable”.
    10/10

    💬 2🔄 6⭐ 15
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:43 AM

    Routine inspections largely stopped, professional visits fell and families were excluded. That removed several layers of oversight simultaneously, increasing the risk that neglect, abuse, poor infection control and deteriorating health would go unnoticed.

    💬 1🔄 5⭐ 10
  • Kit Yateskityates@mas.to
    Oct 20, 2026, 11:43 AM

    The Inquiry’s overarching judgement is that fragmented responsibility, ignored warnings, poor data and inadequate planning created conditions in which Covid could spread “like wildfire”. Social care’s neglect was longstanding.
    During the pandemic, its consequences became catastrophic.

    💬 1🔄 8⭐ 15
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 3
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 3