The point of the passage I was quoting about "second order cybernetics" is that the observer is always part of the system. The challenge is not to find the outside, objective perspective, but that there isn't one.
imo this is like critiquing pharmacology's view of humans as just a vessel for chemical reactions. It definitely can do that, and the critique has value in our current psycho-pharmacological context, but it can also be productive to view humans this way. (1/2)