Login
You're viewing the front-end.social public feed.
  • Nov 9, 2026, 2:39 AM

    @glyph Eh, the exec wages are tiny compared to what shareholders get. Thats the real problem: Institutional money at the stock market. But I wouldnt know where they should put it either. Whole systems fucked man

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Nov 9, 2026, 2:46 AM

    @shellsort disproportionate return to capital is indeed a big problem that needs addressing throughout the market. this is mostly in the context of saying that AI is an unjustified externality and e.g. "clothes" and "phones" aren't; there is actually a huge moral difference between these markets, since it's _possible_ to have a viable non-murder-based mineral supply chain and clothes can be made by workers who are not slaves, but you can't really fix AI's inherent structure, for example.

    💬 2🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Nov 9, 2026, 8:28 PM

    @glyph Why do you say that you can't really fix AI's inherent structure?

    (Which is different from saying that there's not really a chance it will be fixed in this economic system, etc.)

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Nov 9, 2026, 8:36 PM

    @Bubu Doom loops. The inherent untraceability of the provenance of input data and its connection to the output.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Nov 9, 2026, 11:35 PM

    @glyph Do you have an entry point to the doom loop topic? This is the first time I've heard about this, I think, at least under this name and searching for "AI doom loops" just returns articles talking about (from what I can quickly see) wildly differering things?

    About the provenance: I am not actually sure I care about that? Should I?

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0