Login
You're viewing the front-end.social public feed.
  • Nov 4, 2026, 8:01 AM

    @mjg59 my concern with electronic voting machines is that even with no evidence of interference, they provide a breeding ground for mistrust and conspiracy theories. Because to most people they are utterly opaque, regardless of what verification exists in principle, whereas the counting of paper ballots is generally easy to understand.

    💬 2🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Nov 4, 2026, 8:13 AM

    @beardyandrew I do not think they're a great idea! Optical scan feels like a strong trade-off between speed and trust, but also if you're coming from UK elections the whole thing feels kind of confusing because you are not used to having to vote on 50 different things on the same ballot

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Nov 4, 2026, 8:41 AM
    @beardyandrew
    Electronic voting machines that involve hardcopies of every vote are the best way, IMO.

    It allows you to randomly select a number of voting boxes to double check the tally by hand to ensure there's no funny business going on, but to do the majority of counting electronically for speed.
    @mjg59
    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Nov 4, 2026, 8:48 AM

    @wouter …and allow the voter to validate the hardcopy before confirming their vote (you don't want to give the voter a copy because that enables the whole vote buying thing)

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0