Oct 31, 2026, 9:47 AMThis seems pretty clearly the right interpretation, since otherwise an order that you stop publishing a webpage would let you start publishing it via any other means instead (FTP, IPFS, a series of postcards delivered via the Royal Mail, etc)
@mjg59 This is exactly what Meta is using against orders to remove stuff. The case is currently on the next round via the ECJ.
This is Künast vs Meta via Hate Aid.
E.g. https://www.lhr-law.de/en/magazine-en/data-protection-law/federal-court-kuenast-meta-cjeu-referral/
Oct 31, 2026, 10:20 AM@waldi I wouldn't say "exactly" - this is Meta repeatedly publishing material that's been provided by different individuals, rather than the same individuals publishing the same material via different means (I mean it's bad and I have no sympathy for Meta here, it's just there's some difference)