@cwebber I don't think the 3rd Circuit's reasoning is going to hold up, mostly because it would imply that natural intelligence using someone else's ideas to start their own business would be an infringement of the work. That it can be 'true' in movie scripts and 'false' in fast food stores is an issue. The *only* good thing might be to clean up US copyright law, but also unlikely.
Oct 9, 2026, 12:30 AM@ChuckMcManis @cwebber I mean if natural intelligence uses copyrighted materials in a non-/minimally-transformative way to directly compete with the copyright holder, that's a textbook copyright violation. This isn't really any different. I agree US copyright law needs to be cleaned up though (so to for most of the world).
Oct 9, 2026, 1:06 AM@tarix29 @ChuckMcManis @cwebber It seems most plausible that if there is legislation on this topic, it would be to explicitly legalize training bullshit generators.