Login
You're viewing the front-end.social public feed.
  • Sep 6, 2026, 5:51 AM

    "While the YTS (Yarra Transport Strategy) frames safety as important, it is largely positioned as an enabler of shifting people toward active transport options including walking, cycling and public transport. This disconnect reflects a broader policy challenge: whether safety should be pursued and prioritised as a universal goal applied equally across all transport modes, potentially as an alternative to the current program of targeted actions to support mode shift. In Yarra’s context, emphasising safety irrespective of mode could lead to different measures being undertaken, rather than the transformative changes needed to achieve meaningful mode shift such as reallocation of street space."

    This is some seriously cooked nonsense from the agenda for the upcoming City Of Yarra council meeting.

    #CityOfYarra #melbourne #bicycles

    yarracity.vic.gov.au/sites/def

    💬 3🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Sep 6, 2026, 5:52 AM

    @jessta sounds like it was written by AI.
    100% unhuman:
    "This disconnect reflects a broader policy challenge: whether safety should be pursued and prioritised as a universal goal applied equally across all transport modes, potentially as an alternative to the current program of targeted actions to support mode shift."

    💬 1🔄 1⭐ 1
  • Sep 6, 2026, 6:01 AM

    @gusseting I think if someone told me to write something that nonsense I'd probably want to outsource it to AI too.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Sep 6, 2026, 8:54 AM

    @jessta Reading between the lines, they say there's an either-or trade-off between safety and active transport.
    Changing cycling lanes got mentioned, a dog-whistle for pro-car/anti-bike fools.
    Concerned, I read deeper: p132-137.
    They want to axe the Transport Action Plan 2023-2033. The main reason is cost. Second reason is council doesn't care for safety.

    As I see it, the TAP says "Build it and they will come": upgrade 30 km of cycling network, install more cycling infrastructure every year, etc. It has action, measurable results, goals: remove dangers to cyclists, and anticipate increased patronage and improved diversity. If I recall correctly, women who don't cycle but want to ride say their top issue is safety.

    The alternative is puzzling:
    - Light on concrete action.
    - Something vague about community consultation.
    - They want to mix multiple modes of transport together, and bizarrely call it "equality". You want carparks replacing bike lanes and cars running cyclists off the road?

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0