Login
You're viewing the front-end.social public feed.

Replies

  • JzeroGuerillaOntologist@social.coop
    May 29, 2026, 12:53 PM

    In order to make it look like at least one company isn't totally losing their shirt by using "AI," the Financial Times (an outlet that absolutely knows better) was forced to remove expenses from their analysis. Think about that one for a moment: the numbers were so bad that they felt the need to add an asinine assumption, just to avoid coming to the obviously true conclusion: everyone is losing massive amounts of money on this. Yes, even Amazon.

    xcancel.com/askyoshik/status/2

    bar graph showing implied returns on AI investment for Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle. Implied ROI ranges from -35.6 to -9.2, with the exception of Amazon, with a 7.2. However the graph includes this caveat: "implied return on hyperscaler AI investment, 2025-30, assuming zero costs."
    💬 0🔄 2⭐ 2