Login
You're viewing the frogs.lgbt public feed.
  • Apr 16, 2026, 8:38 AM

    Consider e.g. conspiracy theorists, in particularly those who apply magical thinking to language. These usually (or at least pretend to) have a view on language that is very strict on what they receive. They are often also strict on what they send, but perhaps not as strict as with what they receive.

    I consider those conspiracy theorists as my enemies. I try to be very liberal in what I receive and am strict in what I send only when necessary (i.e. usually when writing mathematical stmts, etc).

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0

Replies

  • Apr 16, 2026, 8:47 AM

    urgh I just got pointed at the weird "let's collect marginalizations" meta again.

    That's also closely related to this topic because it often requires a weird interpretation of language (particularly when paired with self-ID) where the labels don't really mean anything except uhhh a very specific aesthetic, which does get policed. Like, non-standard strict for both directions.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0