Login
You're viewing the discuss.systems public feed.

Replies

  • Oct 14, 2026, 7:24 AM

    @whitequark Ah, gotcha. Thought you meant file a bug against keepassxc. Thinking about it, I suspect debian wouldn't want multiple similar implementations of the same functionality and would defer to keepassxc.

    Maybe the solution would be a non-ai suite like we have non-free but that would require too much work since the package/dependency overlap would be hard to administer, and while licenses are clear, ai use is not.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 2🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 7:31 AM

    @bbuk anyway, the upstream builds (we'll publish static Linux x86_64 binaries for the next release) have update checking, so you aren't missing much by not going with a Debian package

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 7:35 AM

    @whitequark Thanks but in general, I feel that such out of band update methods broaden the supplier chain attack surface of a system as well as increase the likelihood of issues between dependency versions.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 7:50 AM

    @bbuk I'm a lot more confident in our ability to build a reproducible binary for all of the supported architectures than I am confident in Linux distros' ability to do so (especially now that Debian voted in favor of using LLMs)

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 8:12 AM

    @whitequark That's a great point. I've delegated my trust of thousands of packages to debian because it's much easier than making the thousands of trust decisions myself, which would obviously be impossible.

    Which OS are you yourself using today to best incorporate the issues in "reflections on trusting trust"? Previously the smaller package numbers in bsd have discouraged me but that seems to be a winning feature now. As soon as I get to a bsd desktop I'll try out chipass!

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 8:15 AM

    @bbuk still Debian, but only because like all of my spare cycles are spent on helping other people escape this fresh hell (not just via ChiPass, but also git-pages and FelineBuildServices)

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 8:24 AM

    @whitequark When the UK started their "government digital services" approach to move away from being beholden to the likes of fujitsu and hp they chose github. I was disappointed and told them they were doing the same thing but they didn't see it at the time. They remained at the mercy of the whims of the US feds/corps and will presumably get ICC'ed in due course.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0
  • Oct 14, 2026, 7:46 AM

    @whitequark I wouldn't want to waste their time considering it for little old me that really doesn't care about passkeys anyway. It has been a while since I built a deb but IIRC the starting point are some config/make files and if upstream maintain those in the source it makes the package maintainer's life much easier and so more likely to be accepted. I could be talking out of my ass though.

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0