Login
You're viewing the discuss.systems public feed.

Replies

  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 8
  • Oct 12, 2026, 5:44 PM

    @Marrekoo @sundogplanets @ravenbait it can work (if the other person cares!) in situations where you disagree on fundamentals: I realize this isn't something that bothers you, but this bothers me quite a bit, and I find it very hurtful that you would continue to do this [involving me somehow], knowing how I feel about it. It's the agree to disagree that still comes with action.

    Which can make it a difficult approach to want to take: clearly I am right and you should be convinced, you should realize why I am right, I should not have to resort to couching it as you tiptoeing around my feelings. It can feel degrading to work out how to phrase it.

    But sometimes it's the only thing I can find that works.

    💬 2🔄 0⭐ 9
  • Oct 12, 2026, 5:49 PM

    @iris @sundogplanets @ravenbait well said. On the other hand, it does offload stuff to the other party. The hardest thing to do is receiving feedback well. They might take it in to think about it, they might concede and try to change their behaviour, or they might shrug it off or refute it. That's on the other side to decide. And it makes it clear what to expect/invest in the future.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 2
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 1🔄 0⭐ 0
  • 💬 2🔄 0⭐ 1
  • 💬 0🔄 0⭐ 6
  • Oct 12, 2026, 6:39 PM

    @jcurioso @elduvelle @iris "they"/"them" can be used as singular non-gendered pronouns. (There was a time they were almost exclusively used as plural pronouns, but now they can be either.)

    P.S. Mastodon thinks your post is written in Dutch, it seems 😆

    💬 1🔄 0⭐ 3
  • Oct 13, 2026, 3:42 AM

    @diazona
    Apparently 'they' for an unknown individual has been in use for a long time. Like we have examples from the 1300s in middle English through to the late 1700s when someone decided the generic pronoun should be 'he'.

    💬 0🔄 0⭐ 0