@kevinrns Well, you kind of were or at least that's what your tone implied (or at least how it read to me).
We can have a good conversation, and I'm glad we do, but that's not how you set this up.
I fully agree with you on ditching big tech but what I agitate against is the assumption that I just carelessly post things. Even more so when it's done in a throwaway line by someone who hasn't engaged with me in any way before. When you take all but two seconds to look at my profile and last few posts it's clear I certainly am not the careless person - far from it.
Starting early 2025 I have made a ridiculous amount of effort to change my entire digital environment. I'm in Europe and my tech environment is 90% European now (which is not easy to achieve). These days every single platform I use is a conscious and deliberate choice, weighing the pros and cons in each case.
But I do use Youtube and I do use Bluesky - both only passively but still. And the simple reason is that I can get content there that I can't get elsewhere. I have highly curated my feeds there to stay away from the toxicity. Where I can move away I do but it's just not always feasible.
I don't think the convenience/control trade off always applies. I ditched Twitter years ago because obviously but I haven't ditched Bluesky as not everyone is in the fediverse, but I have put very strict boundaries about my use of the platform to limit the harm I consume but also may indirectly inflict.
tldr: I respond badly to people assuming the worst even though I work very hard to do my best as is reasonably can (just look at the length of my replies for a start).
Here's the post I referred to: https://c.im/@thisislieven/117285886415975216