@Tutanota > While GenAI-assisted external contributions are prohibited, LLMs are sometimes used internally during development. Our reasoning here is that there's a big difference between accepting LLM-assisted commits from internal teams versus accepting LLM-assisted PRs from the public.

> Internal use is different because whoever is committing LLM-assisted code takes full responsibility for it and is therefore staking their reputation on that code being good. Git blame will also still show their name.
>
> Hope this helps :)

seriously, what is this fucking nonsense. do you imagine none of us have been forced to work with a professional software development team that went in on LLMs before? do you think we’re imagining how fast quality goes down the shitter? do you think your software is a joke? do you think my privacy is a joke?