FFS. Whomever at The Australian did this 'audit' did not listen in high school math. Probability calculations like this are for *independent* events, like coin tosses. But today's weather is not independent of yesterday's weather. We know this because we know the mechanisms.
The Australian often writes about the failures of modern education. This is log in their own eye stuff.
Quote> Another claim of the audit was that a run of 17 consecutive days of 31C maximum temperatures at Palmerville on Queensland’s Cape York in 2004 was evidence of “data failure”. “The probability of this occurring naturally is effectively zero”, the audit report claimed, and “less likely than winning the lottery every week for a year.”