RE: https://mastodon.chriswiegman.com/@chris/116856480734557953
More for me, then.
RE: https://mastodon.chriswiegman.com/@chris/116856480734557953
More for me, then.
My personal take is, you can start working on encryption algorithms that are secure against computing models that are purely theoretical only _after_ you sort out the human factors disaster area in the encryption systems you already built.
garlics have succubus energy cause they're dressed in layers of seductive white silk but underneath it all lies a stinky little witch who'll haunt your dreams & drive you mad with longing
Mixing path parameters, url parameters, and a structured request body, in the same request. As one does.
RE: https://social.coop/@cwebber/116840408969397407
Christine is spot on, as always.
In addition, this seems to open the door to a challenge on whether _any_ disability that is "the object of psychiatric treatment" is a valid basis for a Civil Rights Act or 14th Am. claim. People who rely on disability accommodations for their mental health needs just caught strays, I think.
Edit: a quote from a concurrence is at least not binding, but it's an open invitation to bring more suits.
I am still not over CBU3 putting an honest-to-heck Vore Mouth in the Pictomancer job gauge.
Sorry two things: can you play it five minutes at a time
The only thing I want to know about every mobile game in an app store: does it have an ending
Dadbod Fox
In context it's pretty clear that they _mean_ to ask if this is a call about a body part they were not previously treating, which is boring, but what they asked is if this is a body part you did not previously have.
"If you're calling about a new body part…"
One of the better voicemail lines I've heard from a doctor's office, honestly.
Gotta keep my 17th c memes flowing. Made this today.
RE: https://cosocial.ca/@mhoye/116800893402025472
As a thought experiment, which word processors available today could you use to write _The Anarchist's Cookbook_, if you wanted to?
Asking as I keep my local branch's upstreams pointed at origin/main (the remote default branch), and I keep running into people who think that's unusual, so I want to hear how others are coping with git.
Straw poll for my git-using friends: do you keep your local foo branch's upstream pointed at:
main (a local copy of the default branch)
origin/main (the remote default branch)
origin/foo (the branch you're pushing to)
don't care (don't care)
or something else?
Not a mastodon poll as I'm interested in hearing thoughts more than I am counting answers.
"But who do you consider to be the last Roman emperor?"
"The last Byzantine emperor."
"So you're a schismatic and should be burned at the stake, then?"
"Apparently, because the Pope was just wrong on this one."
I finally found something that reliably makes me drink water by the litre and now I have to piss all the time, but I still wake up dehydrated and sandy most mornings. I can't win.
didn't even kill a royal, smh my head
Lately, everyone’s all like tulip this, and tulip that.
Nah, this is much more like the South Sea Bubble.
Watching my local crop of AI boosters incrementally re-invent big design up front, but as a moral good.