In which Casey continues to have absolutely no understanding of how academia works.

Also talk about a false equivalence here! One of these sides of the “polarising” debate has billions of dollars they want to make more from. The other is an academic just doing their job to reach truth.

I used to love Casey’s work for being critical about emerging tech. Now he’s just being used as another mouthpiece to brand actual critical thought as “polarising” and “self-interested”. It’s disappointing.