If you designed an algorithm that systematically exploited human psychological weaknesses to separate people from their money, you'd make millions and probably end up in jail.
Anyway, gambling is perfectly legal and here's a 200% welcome bonus.
Society is such a fascinating experiment.
Imagine if real engineers said “we asked an AI because checking the integrity of the steel that went into that bridge was slow and boring”. Grow up and do your job, computer touchers
maybe waiting for the AI bubble to pop and people to come to their senses isn't enough. maybe it's up to all of us to #StopTheSlop
idk man, i just think we can't let the sloppers win and take all our spaces and all our hobbies and all our joy from us. we gotta fight back, and if we have to make our own new communities that ban slop to replace old ones that didn't have the backbone to do it, then that's what we gotta do
and i'm not saying it'll be easy. i'm saying that unless we wanna just lay down and give up and die that's our only choice
If a hospital hires a doctor who harms patients, they’re responsible for that hire and they’re responsible for any lack of oversight that let malpractice occur. But they’re not responsible for having actually ••built the doctor•• themselves.
No so here. There’s nothing ChatGPT did that wasn’t the result of a choice OpenAI made.
It is telling that the Proton engineering manifesto states::
"Why has productivity not increased dramatically if everyone is using LLMs all the time already?"
Followed by a number of theories as to what needs to change to improve productivity with LLM use. The most obvious answer is ignored - that LLMs are not dramatically helping productivity and that their direct and indirect costs should be more keenly considered against any gains.
The sooner the AI bubble pops, the sooner our lives will go back to normal.
Gaming fans can go and build their next sweet rig And everyone else can go back to building a computer that suits their needs. And maybe one little silver lining out of all this, Is everyone ends up hating the big platforms? I won’t mention Adobe by name for instance, And people go back to owning their own coffee.
One of the biggest myths we've been told, the lie we've been sold, is that "regulations" are bad.
Regulations protect the people from the rich.
iPhone Duo's hinge, that can destroy the $2000 phone within days, was designed with AI
This stuff's really batting 100
https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/09/the-hinge-for-apples-new-foldable-phone-was-built-with-ai/
Asking for "mates rates" is a massive disrespect. If you know a tradesman pay them the proper going rate and help support their family instead of trying to shaft them
The premise behind the anti-#trans sentiment is that men would endure years of hormone treatment, social stigma, and even surgery, just to visit a public bathroom and pee in a closed stall next to another stall with a woman inside.
That is the dumbest premise for hatred I have ever heard.
Those who transition do so because, after years of consideration, they have realized this is their only viable path to becoming their true selves.
Respect that.
guys is it good when an employee of your e-mail provider says "security is low in our prioritization"
Rest in peace.
I will miss your voice.
Mozilla has announced the Firefox Torment Nexus
go to about:config and set torment.nexus to false
> “So go on there with your personal account and comment to set the record straight,” he wrote. “Perception is more important than truth, the truth doesn’t matter if you don’t win on perception.”
set the record straight by posting something other than the truth, right
RE: https://tech.lgbt/@jnadeau/117519878856755877
Congratulations on catching up to #GTK 3.4 (2012), Apple
@ifixcoinops Touchy-screen laptops are generally useless except for kiosk-mode interactions (I enjoyed using these bathroom facilities) and using Krita or similar creative tools. If they don't have that twist-n-fold-over mechanic they are not useful for that second case and thus relegated to digital smearing.
Please stop anthropomorphizing AI company executives.
They're not sentient and they can't actually think. They just predict token sequences using statistical patterns scraped from LinkedIn, X and the Financial Times. The apparent "understanding" is simply a parlor trick: They produce text strings that *sound* plausible, but they don't actually have any understanding of the world.
I'll grant that they became a lot more technically impressive when Reinforcement Learning from Investor Sentiment pipelines were introduced, but fundamentally they're still just stochastic bullshit generators. Giving them access to the internet will end up being the most expensive mistake in the history of technology.