Opinion
"Why I’m right to be seizing empty homes
Next time you walk past that empty house being left to rot, and wonder why nobody is doing anything about it, remember this – we are, says Angela Rayner
Most of us know a house like it. A few doors down, where nobody has lived for years. Curtains always closed, garden overgrown, even the odd scuttling rat. And everyone wondering why the heck nothing is being done about it.
It’s such a waste.
Especially when families are desperate for somewhere decent to live and there are around 300,000 homes across England that have been left empty long-term.
There are really good reasons why a home might not be lived in for a while. People’s lives are complicated, as I know myself.
But where a perfectly usable house is just sat there, should we really shrug our shoulders and walk on by?
That’s not how we do things.
This government wants councils building again. We’re backing that with £39bn for social and affordable housing over the next decade, alongside our new scheme, Your First Home.
But we also need to make better use of the homes we’ve already got.
So I’m doing something about it. Changing powers councils have had for 20 years to make it easier for them to get more homes lived in again.
At the moment, councils have to wait two years before they can step in and take over the management of a long-empty property. I’m cutting that to six months.
It’s a small but significant change to the law, which I’m making today.
Owners will still own the properties; councils will manage them for a set period of time.
And these are hardly revolutionary new powers. Successive governments since 2006 have chosen to keep them.
The Independent has never shied away from highlighting housing injustice. Plenty of readers won’t have a decent, secure home of their own yet. And it’s simply wrong that almost 180,000 children are growing up in temporary accommodation.
So why should I apologise for making it easier to get people living in homes sitting unused?
To the critics who point out that councils hardly ever use these existing powers, I say – you’re right! And that’s part of the problem.
Councils currently have to wait two years. Then they have to jump through extra hoops to prove things like antisocial behaviour is going on, or prove the wider community supports action.
Make a process so complicated that hardly anyone uses it and you know something’s not working. I’m getting rid of some of what’s getting in the way.
And these changes, which take effect in three weeks, aren’t some great assault on property rights. We’re making a system work better so councils can actually use it.
Of course, this won't solve the housing crisis on its own. Building many more council and social homes has to be at the heart of that.
But hope has to mean getting things done. And while we crack on with our new homes, it makes no sense to waste the ones we’ve already got.
So next time you walk past that empty house being left to rot, and wonder why nobody is doing anything about it, remember this.
We are."
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/angela-rayner-empty-homes-council-powers-seize-scheme-b3066668.html
https://archive.ph/Iurn8
#uk #ukpol #housing #housingcrisis