RE: https://hachyderm.io/@rain/117446589082698170
See this update:
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@rain/117446589082698170
See this update:
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@rain/117446083340236126
Update: Nick G. from Anthropic has responded on HN, and I believe that the attribution is now sufficient. I stand by my posts as of the time I wrote them.
Discuss on Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50106738
Update on my post from yesterday. I am significantly less measured this time: https://sunshowers.io/posts/anthropic-mononoke-2/
Discuss on Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50094694
New blog post: https://sunshowers.io/posts/anthropic-mononoke/
just released port-file on crates.io -- if you tell a child process to bind a service to port 0, facilities for the child to tell the parent what port it actually bound to. A very simple problem solved very well
nerds:
(1) if you don't use `less`, what pager do y'all use?
(2) does your pager support OSC 8 hyperlinks?
Apologies for the late notice, but Rust Bay Area meetup is THIS EVENING in SF! Come join us
We love Rust for how much the compiler helps enforce safety. But sometimes it's up to us to uphold the complex--and often unclear--expectations of what constitutes safety on our own. Oxide colleague, @rain, joined me and @bcantrill to talk about the technical details of what it takes to impose safety on the hardest type of unsafe Rust.
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@rain/116681245175413548
ICYMI, @rain had a terrific blog entry last week -- and today, she joins @ahl and me on Oxide and Friends to discuss the blog entry, the work behind it, and the reaction to it. Join us, 5p Pacific today!
iddqd, or the hardest kind of unsafe Rust.
My first post for the @oxidecomputer
blog! Goes deep into the pitfalls of unsafe Rust and how to reason about it. A lot of labor went into the post -- please have a read!
We're hosting a Rust meetup in SF, WEDNESDAY April 15. Join us!
Read more about how the RustRover IDE supports nextest:
Going to be doing a livestream about cargo-nextest with the JetBrains folks -- Wed April 8, at 10:00 PDT/17:00 UTC. Please register if you're interested!
edit: due to sickness this was postponed — will post the new date as it's finalized!
https://info.jetbrains.com/rustrover-livestream-april9-2026.html
Bay area peeps -- we're hosting an East Bay #rustlang meetup on the 18th! Come join us in downtown Oakland, steps away from BART :)
Published the design document for how nextest implements records, replays and reruns. It's very large — over 6000 words! Lots of decisions and alternatives considered, to make what I believe is the best implementation of this set of features in the industry. Have a look!
Microsoft Productivity Pack for Windows (1992)
I have just been informed that on github, windows CI actions are performed in an environment where C:\ is mounted as a -network- drive.
Which means that the default temporary directory location, normally found on C, is a remote block device.
Which means that every tempfile interaction requires a network transaction to complete.
Which means that github CI actions take -significantly longer to do- and are -more expensive for their operations- than they have to be.
Which has the consequence that -your- cost for github CI actions is greater than it has to be, because those profiteering fucks charge by the minute.
https://docs.github.com/en/billing/concepts/product-billing/github-actions