once a day make sure to say something impulsively negative to someone online, a predictable routine is healthy during periods of change

it shakes me up man. it feels as though tomorrow I will learn that 90% of people were unaware the sky is blue.

and the next day that 75% of people do not know what carpet is.

I just can't believe the most elementary, fundamental information about the living world is not just common knowledge but innate knowledge. is it a piss take? who could possibly think that animals, insects, crustaceans, anybody, couldn't feel emotion????? I need to know how that is possible. so explain it to me, please.

having known this as self-evident from the first time I saw an invertebrate, this article in 2026 breaking the idea that insects have feelings is astonishing.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20211126-why-insects-are-more-sensitive-than-they-seem

answer this question in full: how is it possible for any human being to live upon this earth and not know that animals feel?

psychopathy is characterised by the absence of empathy. if the idea that animals feel is breaking ground in 2026 then it seems a vast majority of human beings have the psychopathy defect.

imagine you live in the russia when all of a sudden your internet goes out, you'd have to put the phone down and do something useful like kill putin for example

I'm sorry Miss Jackson (ooh) I am:

the No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service policy here at the shoe and shirt shop may have been a mistake

yes, this is all just "guns don't kill people, people kill people" but for chatbot.

regulate guns.
regulate gun manufacturers.
regulate gun usage.
OR ELSE kids die.

so

regulate LLM.
regulate LLM manufacturers.
regulate LLM usage.
OR ELSE kids die.

no more AI fairytales, please. we can use cause and effect. common sense is FREE.

we have everything we need to fix evil bullshit with one temporary exception: enough people who know it.

can we end the tedious lie of AI "taking over" the world?

to end it:

1. recognise what could compel someone to want to control a world: fear, desire, or both.

2. recognise no software will ever feel an emotion. no matter how convincingly it seems to simulate it: software does not feel.

3. recognise the designer of a software has emotions, and those affect design decisions and software behaviour.

4. recognise then malicious software behaviour equals malicious design, operation, or both.

if you fw religion then you're vulnerable to the AI corporate psyop, anyway proudly introducing ChatJesusT: your own personal jesus

if you would be willing to share one thing under this poll that you are doing to help make feddy a nice time for others I think a lot of people are probably going to see it, and many of us will find it instructive.

are you having a nice time on feddy?

(boost for inclusivity)

shall I compare thee to a krispy kreme donut

tea so good.

u can just make tea. why do human get mad when it can just make tea.

RE: https://mastodon.social/@kohnzn/117415418834611810

I do advocate training to failure. but not this level of failure.

BROE.

"smart" domestic coffee machine appliance found to send 1TB of data in 10 days

may I suggest investing instead in an elite level coffee making machine currently on the market that can reduce your coffee privacy data violations by a staggering 1TB per day.

it'a called a pot.

https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/man-discovers-his-parents-coffee-machine-used-1tb-of-data-in-10-days-3416399/

AUS: billabong
NZ: invoiceamethpipe

"Quiet Public" is an instruction

as quite a voracious walker I have developed, through experience, the belief that for any passerby there exists a correct way to catch their eye and share a little smile if one can only find it.

political apathy is the only cancer you can inflict on other people