Have been various amounts disappointed and encouraged by universities' reports on AI and what to do about it. Cornell put out a much longer report addressing the triple crisis of AI impacts, loss of public faith in universities, and federal funding chaos that I think is makes an admirable stand in recognizing universities' role in forming good citizens rather than simply being vocational. They had lots to say about the gamification of admissions and the college experience blocking learning for learning's sake.
I think they do a good job of recognizing the deleterious impacts on education but are light on considering how we should approach a technology that might be good for your short term goals but bad for your long term ones including having an information-literate society.
From MIT:
"In a listening session with instructors, we learned that some were considering using AI agents as research assistants instead of hiring undergraduates as UROPs. One can see the case for speed and efficient use of resources (especially now, when research resources are so constrained). But if those criteria come to dominate our decisions, we all have to ask, 'What is it that we are here together to do?' "
From Cornell:
"Learning, as our committee understands it, is not merely the internalization of correct inputs and/or production of correct outputs. It is the slow cultivation of a person through the discipline of reading carefully, studying deeply, communicating effectively, debating
rigorously, creating constructively, and sitting with uncertainty long enough to both respect it and tackle it. These practices are constitutive of the formation of judgment. A student who uses AI to produce an essay has not learned to write. A researcher who uses AI to synthesize existing literature has not learned to deeply engage it. The shortcut bypasses the process through which
understanding is formed and judgment is developed. In a world where machines can synthesize, generate, and analyze at scale, the university’s most important response is neither to restrict AI nor to embrace it uncritically, but to become far more intentional about what remains
indispensably human in the learning process. The challenge is to build curricula, pedagogy, and assessments around the cultivation of those capacities."
-MIT's AI focused report: https://aiandeducation.mit.edu/report/
-Brown's AI focused report: https://provost.brown.edu/sites/default/files/GAITL_Committee_Report_FNL.pdf
-Cornell's much broader report: https://provost.cornell.edu/_files/initiatives/future-of-the-american-university-full-report.pdf